A documentary brought Brandon Teena’s murder to a national audience. Its makers are working on a sequel.

The 1998 film documenting the killing of a transgender Nebraska man renewed a debate about hate facing LGBTQ people. An in-progress follow-up will trace its aftermath. 

News of the killings traveled across the country, far from the small southeast Nebraska city where the gruesome crimes unfolded. 

Two men stalked Brandon Teena, a 21-year-old transgender man, before raping and killing him. They then killed two witnesses in an attempt to conceal the slaying. The events in 1993 inspired the film “Boys Don’t Cry,” but it was a documentary released one year earlier that helped spark a national debate over hate and violence directed at the LGBTQ community.

Now, the New York-based filmmakers behind the doc, “The Brandon Teena Story,” are in the early editing stages for a follow-up, “Aftermath,” likely slated for release in late 2027. It explores the tragedy’s repercussions, revisits figures in the life of Teena — assigned female at birth and later identifying as a man — and examines where trans attitudes and laws have landed in this polarizing era.

“Through these lives, we’re looking at what has changed, what has not changed, are LGBTQ+ transgendered lives better now or worse, is Nebraska better now or worse, and … where are we going,” said Greta Olafsdottir, one of the filmmakers. 

Olafsdottir and her partner, creatively and in life, Susan Muska, have plenty of ground to cover. 

In 2023, Nebraska lawmakers outlawed gender transition surgeries for anyone younger than 19. They also tasked the state with regulating other gender-related care, such as the use of puberty blockers, for that same age group. The bill received national attention, in part due to a three-week filibuster led by Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh and protests in response to the legislation. 

Two years later, lawmakers barred student-athletes from playing on sports teams that didn’t align with their sex at birth. A proposal to put that law into the state’s constitution — making it much harder to repeal the 2025 law — could go before Nebraska voters this fall.

Susan Muska and Greta Olafsdottir in Omaha. Courtesy photo

Two other transgender bills, including one limiting public bathroom use to a person’s sex at birth, failed to pass earlier this year. Sen. Kathleen Kauth, the lawmaker who introduced all those bills, has described them as common sense. She told the Nebraska Examiner in February that “the tide is turning” on these issues.

Public opinion surveys indicate that nationally, a majority of Americans favor restricting sports participation to sex at birth, with polling by Gallup showing 69% of respondents favored those restrictions in 2025, up from 62% in 2021.

The filmmakers say they’re alarmed by the larger cultural shift and the recent legislation.

“Once you have something as a law,” Olafsdottir said, “that takes time to change, and meanwhile it basically diminishes LGBTQ+ people. This is exactly, of course, what leads to hate crime — when you have law enforcement looking the other way because they can.” 

Hundreds of people descended on the Nebraska State Capitol in May 2023 to protest a proposed ban on gender-affirming care in transgender minors. Their chants, yells and foot-stomping at times drowned out debate on the legislative floor. AP Photo/Margery Beck

Despite their personal views, they made sure to talk to both supporters and opponents of the 2023 Nebraska bill when they were shooting for the new film. It’s emblematic of how the two approach the process. 

The original documentary germinated out of Muska’s trip to Nebraska following Teena’s murder. A friend had been assigned to cover the killing for The Village Voice — reporting that would help catapult the initial story into the national spotlight. Muska served as her driver. She also pursued her own lines of inquiry during the trip.

“I did a very short TV piece about it and then I talked to Greta about it and she was really interested,” Muska recalled. “I think the first trip we took (together) to Nebraska, we went for the arraignments. Then we visited a couple people who were very involved.” 

The two came in without much of a plan — they didn’t know where those initial conversations would take them or what they would have access to. They also didn’t know how they, as outsiders poking into a loaded subject, would be received. They took a personable and low-pressure approach. 

“Nobody was ever hostile. In general, everyone was hospitable … We even had a great relationship with the cops,” Olafsdottir said.

Omaha filmmaker Mele Mason films a seminar about gender given to law enforcement officers in Nebraska by Joni Watke. Courtesy photo

Veteran Omaha videographer Mele Mason, who covered the Teena case for major news networks and is helping shoot the new doc, noted things could have gone differently if not for their approach. 

“I do believe that as New Yorkers coming to the Falls City area to cover a transgender-involved murder was pretty brave. But their genuine, friendly and patient demeanors as well as healthy senses of humor really win subjects over.”

Strategically, Muska and Olafsdottir opted to observe before diving head first into interviews. For law enforcement in particular, they waited to conduct interviews until after the trials wrapped in 1995, Muska said. The approach and respect for the court proceedings helped establish credibility. It also required time — a full two years passed before the trials concluded. 

In much the same way, the follow-up has required patience. Olafsdottir and Muska started working on the film a decade ago, but paused the project when the COVID-19 pandemic hit. They recently have been back researching and interviewing, and are now beginning the process of sifting through all their material. Inevitably, they will realize there’s something that they missed, Muska said. The process could delay their hoped-for release date. 

Susan Muska and Mele Mason interview George Marburger, owner of the Humboldt Standard, for the follow-up documentary “Aftermath.” Courtesy photo

“Documentary films take time, and you have to allow for that. … I think they all need their space, their attention, and these unexpected beautiful things that pop up that you never thought of,” Olafsdottir said.

She recalled several examples from the first film. In an initial cut, both were dissatisfied with the first 20 minutes. They asked power-writing couple John Gregory Dunne and Joan Didion for their feedback. Didion suggested they take the end and put it at the beginning.

“It was a bold move, but we trashed the first 20 minutes, redid it, and it worked,” Olafsdottir said.

One key difference this time around is Mason’s involvement. She gives the project the ability to respond immediately if an urgent development occurs. She also is an incredible cameraperson, Olafsdottir said. The three are working as a team, with everyone providing input on the film’s aesthetics, Muska added.

“We just love her,” Olafsdottir said. “And she’s local. That’s very important for us.”

Along with covering recent events, the filmmakers also revisited some sources from the original film, which they worked on for four years. They have maintained many of those relationships over the years, even occasionally returning for weddings and funerals.

Olafsdottir recalled that they had spent so much time in Falls City for the original documentary that on one of their last visits a person remarked, “Oh my God, are you back again? When are you going to be done?” 

Eli Rigatuso. Courtesy photo

“For the new film, we’re getting to that point. Everyone is like, ‘Enough now.’ But it’s not. It’s done when it’s done,” Olafsdottir said. 

Omaha activist Eli Rigatuso is among those who appreciate the long-term commitment and care that Muska and Olafsdottir have dedicated to Teena’s story. Rigatuso was living as a lesbian when first viewing the original documentary. Years later, Rigatuso came out as transgender and transitioned to a man. He eventually connected with the filmmakers and shared how much their film meant to him.

“They have continued to return to Nebraska, not just to document, but to listen,” Rigatuso said. “Their work honors Brandon Teena’s life and legacy in a way that continues to challenge people to confront the realities of transphobia, violence and erasure.” 

They get defensive when some stereotype the state.

New York-based filmmakers Greta Olafsdottir and Susan Muska said they have grown attached to Nebraska since making their 1998 documentary “The Brandon Teena Story.” The project required many trips to the state. “We have friends here now that we’ve had for over 30 years that we really care about,” Muska said. Courtesy photo

Olafsdottir recalled after a screening of the original documentary in New York City, an audience member remarked during a post-screening forum that “it’s so typical” such a hateful crime would take place in Nebraska.

“And we were like,’Uh, uh, stop.’ It’s so easy to say it happens just here because then you don’t have to look at where you live,” Olafsdottir said. “The unfortunate truth is that this could happen anywhere — and it has.”

By Leo Adam Biga

Author-journalist-blogger Leo Adam Biga has been telling stories about people, their passions and their magnificent obsessions for four decades. The Omaha native and UNO graduate is a freelance contributing writer for various print publications and online media platforms. His work has been recognized by the Omaha Press Club, the Nebraska Press Association and the American Jewish Press Association. He is the author of the books "Alexander Payne: His Journey in Film" and "Crossing Bridges: A Priest's Uplifting Life Among the Downtrodden."

22 Comments

So Flatwater is… what? Basically just an art critic blog now? Thats why we get articles about old guys painting landscapes and every obscure documentary that gets released?

Or is it that these stories always have a certain political undercurrent? While Bud Light loses millions of dollars and it’s spot as the top beer brand in America, Flatwater is out here promoting the same thing… in June, of course.

And I’m sure Flatwater will never publish an article about Audrey Hale. Because that isn’t quite the sort of message you want to send, is it?

Your intolerant comment for an article largely about intolerance for other views and lifestyles is duly noted.

NO H8 IN OUR STATE!

J. Gross I speak for a lot of people on this site when I say I find your comments ignorant and not at all interested in dialogue or open communication.

I’m not sure why you are so militant in your posts or why you show absolutely no openness to actually debating a point in good faith.

You come across as a very small person who has nothing better to do than troll the FFP comment section.

M Lierley, I speak for common sense when I say that the claims made in your comment are the exact opposite of the truth.

J Gross, while he does not always say things I’m the way I would personally say them, he consistently expresses viewpoints that I strongly agree with. He makes many of the same points that I have made, that Flatwater articles are too reliant on emotional personal anecdote and often contain an obvious political bias.

When people like yourself respond to either myself or J Gross, the responses are consistent in only two ways. They are never polite and they always resort to personal attacks. No one ever attempts to provide any meaningful response to our arguments. At best they engage in sophistic attempts to make us out to be the bad guys because we pointed out the problems with an article (as you just did). At worst, they launch into blatantly obscene insults and internet trolling.

The two of us are the people who most frequently challenge Flatwater in the comments section, but we aren’t the only ones. Many articles receive at least a few replies from other readers who are often flabbergasted by the conclusions Flatwater arrives at in their articles. But all such critics tend to just get shouted down by people saying, “if you don’t like it, don’t read it!!”

“J. Gross I speak for a lot of people on this site…”

Yeah no you don’t

Nice try though.

I’ve answered that question about an umpteen billion times in these comments, so I don’t feel compelled to answer it yet again.

Suffice to say, this still isn’t news, and if your only rebuttal is to try to chase me away, then I think my point is made.

What message do you want them send? She was suffering from depression, she bought several guns all legally, she had a job, lived with her very religious parents, went to the school where she shot and killed several students.
She was like all the other mass shooters who either were suffering from mental illness or just wanted to be famous.
Is that what you want them to report? Maybe Flatwater doesn’t want to regurgitate fox news talking points.

Did you read her manifesto, Morgan? I have read it. Cover to cover.

Audrey Hale openly admits that the Christian school she shot up was actually her FAVORITE school, and the only one she attended where she said she had been treated with respect. She didn’t actually blame religion, her school or her parents, but more so society as a whole.

The target was selected, in spite of her personal feelings about the matter, because she believed it was the most vulnerable target that would send the most effective political message. She compared herself to other mass shooters and believed her tactics would achieve a higher kill count than other similar shooters. Ironically, by her own self-chosen metrics her attack would be considered a failure.

Numerous times throughout the manifesto she made it clear that her gender transition was the source of her frustration and that she was indecisive about if she regretted it or not. Not knowing if she was male or female, or if she was any good at being either one, was what drove her mad.

Facts aren’t “fox news talking points” just because some people don’t like hearing about them. I’m here at Flatwater because I listen to “talking points” from both sides of the political isle. But after hearing both sides, I use my own judgement to decide who was right.

And I think that’s actually the irony of the whole “if you don’t like it, don’t read it” mentality. You say that you want people to be more open-minded and tolerant. Yet you admit that you won’t listen to arguments from the other side and you apparently don’t want the other side to listen to your arguments either. How are we ever going to achieve any kind of understanding if we just retreat into our own echo chambers? Thats how you end up with Audrey Hale’s in the first place.

Fun side note: Nebraska Examiner published an article on mass shooter warning signs today. Very informative and educational stuff.

Meanwhile Flatwater… hasn’t published anything new since last week*, when they provided us with some articles about a guy eating weird stuff on social media and a largely unknown college extra-curricular activity.

(*Although I did notice that “sponsored” article that was taken down very quickly. Hmmm.)

J. Gross, Kofi, whomever. Whatever point you are trying to make (or think you are trying to make) is lost behind your seeming inability to own your comments (and the potential for dialogue). Of course, a dialogue with FFP readers and journalists may not be your goal at all.

Still. Writers put their bylines on stories and most FFP comments appear to include a real name. Own your posts.

Ad hominem: Attacking the source of an argument rather than addressing the argument itself.

Even if I gave you my real name, I would have provided the exact same criticism. So how does my name change the substance of my argument? Either you can refute what I have said or you cannot.

And you may note that even the Flatwater editor himself, Matthew Hansen, has admitted that the rules of his own comments section do not actually require people to provide their real names. This comment section is designed so that anyone can type in and use any name they want, with no mechanism to verify if the name provided is accurate. And with that being the case, how do I know that “Devon N” is a real name or that you “own” your post any more than I “own” mine?

“Olafsdottir recalled after a screening of the original documentary in New York City, an audience member remarked during a post-screening forum that “it’s so typical” such a hateful crime would take place in Nebraska. ” I found the remark that was made ” it’s so…” really disconcerting, because it sound like that person seems to think that hate crimes happen in Nebraska all the time!!! How wrong they are!!!!! Obviously, they know NOTHING about the midwest, or even outside of NYC!!!

I agree Paula!

It’s noteworthy how all of these different artists, directors, and so on that Flatwater chooses to platform are consistently non-residents of Nebraska and their edgy opinions are clearly in opposition to what the majority of Nebraska residents would say about the same topics.

So are the Flatwater writers merely ignorant of the real world situation here in Nebraska? Or do they choose to be tone deaf in order to advance their own opinions?

She was not “assigned” a gender at birth. No one is. The doctor doesn’t play eenie, meenie miny mo and select one gender over another. Nor does the doctor track calling the last one a male, so let’s call this one female. We, all of us, are born either male or female. Cut the “assigned” fiction

Actual “intersex” people are on the borderline of non-existent. In extremely rare circumstances a child is born with birth defects that may cause them to have some biological elements of both male and female anatomy. These birth defects are typically corrected and the child attempts to live a normal life as a single gender.

What you are talking about about is not the objective science of biology, but the ever-shifting opinions of subjective social science. You are talking about normal children who were not born with any birth defects and were objectively members of an obvious gender. But at a later time in their life someone told them that gender could be a subjective opinion.

That isn’t biology. That isn’t science. That’s Bill Nye dancing in silly costumes with Rachel Bloom and yelling about genitalia. And that is exactly the reason people are beginning to turn against this insanity.

I agree with you Terry!

Biology is an objective science. And as you said, it is generally quite obvious to the doctor when a baby is born what their gender is, as the evidence for such is located on the exterior of the child’s body. Up until very recently, this was a completely non-controversial concept that had dominated the whole of human history and science.

As other legitimate news outlets have recently reported (per Gallup polling results), support for this kind of “gender” ideology is taking a nosedive in America right now. Even some activists who still support homosexual marriages and other similar things are rapidly turning against “gender” ideologies.

And that is what makes it such an interesting choice for Flatwater to platform a “documentary” of this sort at this specific moment in history. Either Flatwater is actively trying to choose the side they want to be on in this debate… or they are simply tone deaf to what is happening around them.

I’m so glad to have read this article. I’m a native Nebraskan and I didn’t know that Brandon Teena’s story took place in NE. So enlightening.

My question to all those arguing about someone else’s birth sex, is when has it ever affected you to the point that you even need to share your opinion. Live and let live.

If we should “live and let live” then why is Flatwater still muckraking the Brandon Teena issue all these years later?

Leave a Reply