A Nebraska inmate went on his girlfriend’s podcast. Then the prison cut off their contact.

Julie Montpetit didn’t see it coming. Not her newfound passion for criminal justice reform, and certainly not her current predicament: blocked from talking to the man she loves, a man locked in prison thousands of miles away.

Her husband, Nicholas Ely, is suing several employees in the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, alleging that the department cut off their means of contact after Montpetit launched a podcast that aims to destigmatize relationships like theirs. She interviewed Ely by phone for the first episode.

In his lawsuit, Ely — representing himself — alleges that department rules don’t restrict inmates from appearing on podcasts and that the department’s retaliation has violated several constitutional rights, including his right to free speech. 

A Corrections spokesperson didn’t answer emailed questions, citing pending litigation. 

The case speaks to the evolving ways prisoners interact with the outside world and a need for clear prison policy governing their participation in modern platforms like podcasts, according to two Nebraska prison experts.

“When things like this take place, as the world is changing with social media and everything, it’s important for the department to have consistent rules and policies to address these if they have concerns,” said Inspector General Doug Koebernick, the state’s Corrections watchdog. “And they really need to take some time to figure out what’s a rule violation and what is not.”

Montpetit said she and Ely have found ways to continue communicating despite Corrections’ restrictions. But, she said, they’re both struggling to cope with the stress.

From pen pal to podcast

Montpetit, who’s 36 and lives in Alberta, Canada, had been on a “journey of soul-searching” when she and her friends started scrolling through an Instagram feed of inmates seeking pen pals. They played a drinking game, she said, watching videos and guessing the inmates’ crimes. 

It gave her an idea: What if there were an older man out there serving a life sentence, with time on his hands to study life’s big questions — the universe, religion, philosophy — and help her find answers? 

She visited a prison pen pal website and landed on Ely’s profile. 

Ely had, in 2011, been in a group that planned to rob 25-year-old Kristopher Winters in Omaha. Someone in the group fatally shot Winters. A jury had convicted Ely of felony murder. He is serving a life sentence without parole.

Aside from his sentence, nothing about 35-year-old Ely fit her initial pen pal parameters. But he intrigued her enough to send a message in January 2024. 

They started messaging back and forth and reading books together — “exactly what I was looking for,” Montpetit said in a phone interview.

By July, they were talking for hours each day, and she was telling her mom about plans to fly to Nebraska for a visit.

It shocked her mother, Montpetit said, to hear about the relationship from her daughter who had always followed the rules.

Montpetit said she lost friends who doubted the authenticity of the relationship, and she started connecting with women in relationships with incarcerated men. She began talking to Ely’s mom on a daily basis.

Montpetit (right) and Ely got married in February 2025 in a 20-minute ceremony at the Reception and Treatment Center in Lincoln. Photo courtesy Julie Montpetit

Last summer, she took a manuscript Ely wrote and published it as a book. Ely bought a copy, but the prison didn’t allow him to have it, according to Ely’s complaint.

Montpetit eventually floated the idea of launching a podcast to humanize inmates and the people who love them. 

For her first episode, she interviewed Ely. They chatted about their love story and the stigma surrounding relationships like theirs. About how much he has grown as a person since his criminal conviction.

“Had our paths crossed at any other time in our lives, I probably would not have been ready for you,” Ely says on the episode. “But I’m so glad that the universe made me wait all these years and go through all the things that I had to go through to mold and shape me into becoming the person that was ready for you.”

Montpetit dropped that episode Nov. 14, calling the new podcast “More Than an Inmate’s Girlfriend,” playing off a Facebook page called “More Than An Inmate,” where Montpetit and family members regularly post messages from Ely for his 3,000 followers. 

That’s “the day literally everything changed,” Montpetit said.

Listen to the podcast episode: “More Than an Inmate’s Girlfriend

From love story to lawsuit

Ely alleges in his lawsuit that retaliation started the same day when staff searched the special management unit cell where he typically spends 21 hours a day. Montpetit said she started getting messages about the search from other inmates’ loved ones.

A few days later, Montpetit was suddenly absent from his phone list and email account. 

The department had also removed a friend and his mom from his email account, according to the suit, though his mom has since been restored.

As he started asking questions, he got differing responses from prison officials — one intel captain said the podcast caused a “knee-jerk reaction” from the prison but asked Ely to be more transparent with them, Ely wrote. Meanwhile, a deputy warden threatened solitary confinement and called the podcast “anti-establishment, anti-authority” and “anti-government.”

The only regulation around inmate interviews in NDCS policy, according to Ely, is that they should not be compensated. 

A Corrections spokesperson declined to provide information about the internal policies at play. 

The department’s public-facing prison policy is “really ambiguous” in this situation, said Danielle Jefferis, a University of Nebraska law professor who specializes in prisoner civil rights. 

In recent years, Nebraska’s prisons have introduced tablets that inmates now use to receive their mail, communicate with loved ones and stream media such as podcasts, Jefferis said. The outward-facing policy doesn’t appear to have kept up.

Ely filed grievances and submitted requests to the warden. Montpetit sent her own messages to prison leaders. The restrictions stayed in place.

A letter from then-Warden Taggart Boyd, dated Dec. 17, states that Montpetit’s virtual and in- person visits were “suspended indefinitely” due to security risks associated with her “being complicit in and helping Ely facilitate continuous violations of NDCS regulations,” including unauthorized business practices and communications.

Copy of a letter from the warden informing Monpetit that her visits had been suspended.
Letter from the warden informing Monpetit that her visits had been suspended.

But they’d had virtual visits after Dec. 17, Montpetit said, and she didn’t get a response to a request for copies of the allegedly violated policies.

They had already planned to get married but accelerated their plans, reasoning that the prison couldn’t keep them from talking to each other if they were immediate family, Montpetit said.

She flew to Nebraska to get a marriage license, she said. Ely submitted a marriage application to a case manager for their planned visit on Christmas Day.

The prison rejected his marriage request, according to his complaint. Then the prison denied their Christmas visit altogether. In January, Ely submitted a new marriage application.

“The defendants have been using the plaintiff’s visits, marriage, and associations with loved ones (phone/email) as weapons to retaliate against the plaintiff for publishing a book and being interviewed for a podcast,” Ely alleges in his lawsuit.

They were ultimately approved to marry in February. Montpetit was allowed to be with Ely for their 20-minute ceremony, but she wasn’t allowed to stay for a typical two-hour visit, she said.

After the wedding and a meal with family, she went to the state Capitol and testified in support of a bill that would give some inmates serving long sentences a chance at earlier release. She said she also has been advocating for changing Nebraska’s felony murder law that landed Ely in prison for life.

“My life has completely flipped: My passions, my drive, everything has completely changed, and I feel like I’m exactly where I need to be,” she said.

Since their wedding, she said she hasn’t seen Ely in person or via video. 

Seeking communication and compensation

The restrictions on communicating with his wife have triggered anxiety and depression — “irreparable harm,” Ely wrote. 

“For no real reason, the defendants have removed the plaintiff’s wife from his life, leaving an empty void and lack of meaning,” he wrote. His mom has written to the department for help getting him mental health support.

Severing ties can compound a feeling of isolation that’s already a painful feature of life behind bars, according to Jenn Tostlebe, who teaches and researches criminology at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. 

Visits from loved ones early on and consistently throughout their prison sentence can bolster well-being and promote good behavior, she said.

“This loss can create this sense of social isolation, and therefore strain, in their life where they are missing somebody and it’s mentally taxing and, therefore, it contributes to the likelihood that they’ll resort to misconduct as a means of coping with this loss,” Tostlebe said.

Not every visitor is a positive influence, and not every visit goes well, she said, but visits are important for most inmates — and many inmates never get a visitor.

“Really, unless it’s a harm to the institution, I don’t feel like it should be taken away,” she said. 

Montpetit said the stress prompted her to take leave from her job as an operations manager for a dessert manufacturer. She said she and Ely feel they have exhausted their options and the lawsuit was a last resort.

In it, Ely asks the court to let Montpetit visit, to restore their ability to contact each other and to  take part in interviews without retaliation. He also asks for compensation and a jury trial.

Prison policies have to comply with the U.S. Constitution, Jefferis said, but the First Amendment has been interpreted to be somewhat limited behind bars.

“When we think about legal issues arising within prisons, those undefined areas where prison officials can exercise their discretion are where problems arise often,” she said.

Read Nicholas Ely’s lawsuit

The U.S. Supreme Court has said restrictions on First Amendment rights are constitutional in prison if they’re reasonably related to “legitimate penological interests,” Jefferis said, and usually that interest is security or order in a prison. The department will likely present evidence that officials contend justifies their restrictions.

A hearing is scheduled for Oct. 23 in Lancaster County District Court about Ely’s request that Montpetit be allowed to visit and communicate with him while his case is pending. 

Montpetit voiced frustration that there are other podcasts out there — like One Minute Remaining or Wrongful Conviction — that interview inmates behind bars. She’d also be OK with the department reviewing episodes before they publish.

“We just want to be able to see each other,” Montpetit said.

By Sara Gentzler

Sara keeps an eye on state government: Its many agencies, the governor's office, courts and the Legislature. She has unearthed troubling data on how Nebraska helps both its crime victims and its convicted criminals, analyzed the effects of low legislator pay and reported on lawmakers' conflicts of interest.

22 Comments

“podcast that aims to destigmatize relationships like theirs. ”

Not only should “relationships” like this be stigmatized, they should be the target of universal ridicule if not ignored completely.

And shame on FFP for wasting resources and space in a lame attempt to normalize the criminally abnormal. This inmate, and his severely disturbed “girlfriend”, are not the victims–MY GOD, the guy was an accomplice to a MURDER and convicted of it! The MURDERER does not need a pen pal–he needs a pen of pentobarbital.

This poor lady does not need a pen pal–she needs professional help. Did the FFP make any attempt to help this poor, misguided woman?

SHAME ON FFP! SHAME!

Do better FFP. Be better. Gawd awful…

Hello Sir,

My name is Nicholas J. Ely, the subject of the article from FFP this morning. I heard your comment that was posted, and I respect your opinion, but just wanted to take a moment to introduce myself.

You’re right…I have been found guilty of being an accomplice to a murder (and am currently serving a natural life sentence behind it) but I was actually accused of being an accomplice to a robbery…a robbery that went terribly wrong and resulted in the death of a young man. And this isn’t much better, I understand that, but it is a little different than intentionally assisting a murder.

You see, in 2011 I was a 20 year old kid who couldn’t foresee the consequences of his actions and couldn’t possibly conceive that a robbery may result in a homicide, especially because I never touched a weapon. This may sound hard to believe, but it’s the truth. I wasn’t the smartest 20 year old in the world and I made a series of mistakes. But I am not a murderer, and I’ve never wanted to hurt anybody.

I was found guilty of murder under an archaic law that several states have began to get rid of. It’s called the “felony murder” rule. This rule means that anyone involved in a robbery that unintentionally results in a death is held accounttable for the actual murder…even if they played no part. I was accused of walking into a home with a group of people, nothing more.

Do I deserve to be punished for this level of participation?–absolutely. I know I do…but I don’t believe that a natural life sentence is the reasonable response to my level of involvement.

But here I am…and I’m not complaining to you about it. I’ve accepted my lot in life and am filled with remorse for the young man’s life who was lost. I’ve spent over a decade working on myself in hopes of finding redemption and becoming capable of receiving forgiveness from the victim’s family, as well as my society. Years of reflection have helped me understand why I was a troubled young man, which led me to healing and recovering from my own past. It led me to becoming a rehabilitated person.

This rehabilitated person is who my wife fell in love with…not the twenty year old version of myself who I no longer even recognize. As we all can relate to, none of us are the same person now as we were when we were twenty, and I happened to make a mistake that was worse than most. But I pay the price daily for this mistake by having missed my entire life, as well as my little brothers, sisters, nephews, and nieces, and I don’t know what it means to live as a free person. These things are my consequences, and they eat at me daily. But I hope that you can see how a guy like myself may deserve a shot at love, even if it’s not how everyone else gets to experience it. I will never live a normal life, I will probably always be in prison, but I do deserve to be loved…and she’s not crazy for loving me. She loves a good man, a man I’ve worked hard to become.

Overall, this investigation was into our constitutional privileges to free speech…and how far it goes. The constitution does promise incarcerated people the freedom of speech, and when you’re retaliated against for practicing a promised protection, it should be a newsworthy story. There’s so many worse things going on inside of these prisons that the news doesn’t cover…but the FFP made a choice to report about a constitutional matter. I’m sorry you feel it to be a waste of resourrces, but this report has been a tremendous support to my family and others who are suffering retaliations from prison officials who abuse their authority. I post daily about the things going on inside here on Facebook.com/morethan.aninmate if you’re curious to learn more, but FFP has chosen to focus on the news that can affect all of us…First Amendment restrictions from the state.

All in all, I’m glad to be able to have heard your opinions on this matter and respect you either way. I love our country and am glad we have platforms available whereon we can discuss these matters.

Thank you for your time. I truly hope you can see me as more than my worst mistake, and my wife as a woman dedicated to the man she loves, because we wish nobody harm. We just want to be able to communicate.

I wish you nothing but the best.

Sincerely,

Nicholas J. Ely
More Than An Inmate

At no point in the article does the journalist or FFP editor make any attempt to normalize or justify the behavior in the story. The article includes balanced reporting from the subjects’ perspectives, the NE DoCS, and subject matter experts.

At no point was an attempt made to justify the inmates actions and the article is entirely up-front with readers that he was convicted as an accomplice to murder. Nobody’s pulling the wool over anyone’s eyes here. This story presents a really interesting look at how our state laws and institutional policies haven’t exactly kept up with modern technology. Prisoners for decades, even convicted felons, have been able to have phone calls and write letters.

It’s clear that you’ve rushed to make a value judgement and have failed to consider the larger picture here, as with many of your comments on other FFP articles. Do better!

You my friend are a very poor man. This woman is a graduate of McGill University in Montreal. This is one of the most respected universities in Canada. I am a proud Canadian citizen where our inmates are treated humanly. I treat my pet better than the prison system does in the USA. Many young offenders are given long sentences with no regard of their young age. What happened to trying to rehabilitate these prisoners. The USA has the most incarcerated in the world. Prisons are over flowing. I don’t even want to address the death penalty. I believe you are the uninformed and uneducated person. Have a great day!!

To J. Gross,
The bottom line is this: there is no written Nebraska policy banning inmates from participating in a podcast. Without a clear rule or a proven security risk, cutting off his contact isn’t “enforcing the rules”, it’s retaliation. Incarcerated people do not lose their First Amendment rights; the Supreme Court has been very clear that restrictions must be tied to legitimate safety concerns, which NDCS has not shown here. Add to that the fact that his conviction itself is disputed, and it makes this even more troubling; we’re talking about a man who may not even belong in prison in the first place. On top of that, decades of research show family support is one of the strongest factors in rehabilitation and reducing recidivism. So when a prison severs a husband and wife’s connection over a podcast, it doesn’t make anyone safer, it exposes injustice, silences truth, and undermines rehabilitation. Lastly, I think marriage and family are their own right to form, and it is not for anyone to judge or question, this is part of the freedoms our country is meant to protect.

“Add to that the fact that his conviction itself is disputed”

Huh? NO ONE disputes this conviction (other than the convicted…predictably). You can look up his many appeals, but that would take some effort. It’s just easier to defer to the criminal, right?

It’s truly telling that you made no mention of the INNOCENT VICTIM of this “man’s” crime–an amazing lack of compassion.

May God help us.

This is the very definition of a con game. as a former Nebraska Department of corrections employee you see this all the time he’s doing a life sentence, but he will probably petition the court in a few years, wanting his life sentence relook at so he can have parole and he’s using somebody on the outside to get what he needs as for him being on a podcast that is very dangerous . The questions asked on the podcast. He could’ve formulated the answers to code to someone on the outside about the facilities Security what per the perimeter checks are done about when they’re done how many correctional staff are on duty yeah she may think this sounds like TV spy stuff but it does happen so classic con game is what he’s playing and this woman is one of those many women who seem to get a thrill a lot of having a incarcerated spouse or boyfriend and think it’s cool so yes, this woman and this inmate should be prosecuted.

This article is very sad, but not for the reason the author likely wanted us to see it as sad.

In our prisons here in Nebraska, we actually do have some older individuals who have received life sentences and subsequently have spent great deals of time considering the consequences of their actions. I know some of these men and respect them. Some of them have been given the responsibility of teaching rehabilitative programs to their fellow prisoners. Some of them have found religion and could cite biblical scripture better than any pastor.

But that is the sad irony of this article. Rather than spotlighting a truly deserving person in desperate need of a second chance, the author chose to highlight a neurotic Canadian woman who decided during a drinking game that it was a good idea to seek out convicted murders for companionship, a decision which now has her locked into a marriage with an immature fool who can’t follow simple prison policies. And by highlighting this laughably terrible example of deviant behavior, the author will actually make it more difficult for well-behaved prisoners who truly deserve a second chance to get a fair consideration of their cases.

Shame on the Flatwater Free Press for publishing this awful article! Compare the work you did with this piece to the one you wrote about Busboom. In that article Busboom was a sympathetic character we actually cared about. The woman in this article sounds like a good reason to close the borders with Canada! Yikes!

Interesting story about a very messy human experience. I hope the couple well. You really don’t know what people are going through until you get a chance to learn. I’ve heard several stories about our incarcerated population, some good, some bad. But stories like this make me remember we are all human. Thank you

Why do unrepentant inmates have access to the internet? And for the record, felony murder statutes are not archaic or rare . Nearly every state has felony murder statutes that cover a variety of violent crimes. (but, never doubt a murderer’s ability to attempt to excuse his crimes). Will FFP make a correction?

It sure is comforting to know that God resides in the pen: so many inmates find Him there that maybe we should not have parole…God help them.

And FFP continues to give these MURDERERS a platform?

Do better FFP.

Good observation Mr. Gross! Prison inmates DON’T have access to the internet. They have very limited and tightly controlled ability to communicate with approved individuals on the tablets they are issued. Those tablets have software installed (much like child protection software you might use at home) which prevent them from making public comments on the open internet. When an inmate attempts to circumvent those restrictions (for example, by asking his Canadian girlfriend to post a podcast for him) it is a violation of the established prison rules. So that raises an interesting question. Is the person in this comment section claiming to be Ely lying about their identity? Or did Ely just break the rules again, thus proving that the prison was right to punish him?

It’s very clear from Nicholas Ely’s own words that he is not asking anyone to erase accountability, but to acknowledge truth and growth. He has served over a decade, taken responsibility, and shown what rehabilitation looks like, which is supposed to be the point of our justice system. You’re criticizing his wife for loving him, but you’ve overlooked that she is educated, capable, and chose to commit to a man who has demonstrated change. That’s not “disturbed,” that’s human.

And as I have already pointed out, there is no policy that bans inmates from speaking on a podcast. This wasn’t a “security issue,” it was retaliation, which makes it a First Amendment issue that absolutely deserves coverage. It matters because if prisons can silence voices simply for speaking truth, it threatens not just incarcerated people but the rights of every citizen.

Elizabeth also made a vital point: the U.S. incarcerates more people than any country in the world, and often under outdated laws like the felony murder rule, laws that even many states are repealing because they lead to excessive and unjust sentences. Nicholas himself was convicted under this rule, meaning he did not kill anyone yet is serving life as if he had. That distinction matters, and ignoring it does nothing but spread misinformation.

At the end of the day, rehabilitation and family connection are proven to reduce violence, reduce recidivism, and make society safer. So instead of ridiculing a couple who found love against all odds, perhaps we should be questioning a system that punishes growth, silences speech, and denies people the very support that helps them change.

And finally, their marriage, their commitment, their love, is none of our business to judge. Who are we to question two adults choosing each other, when family and love are rights guaranteed to all of us? That is, after all, part of what this country is supposed to stand for, isn’t?

I would encourage readers of this article to dig a little deeper, particularly in regards to one detail that was only briefly mentioned in passing. After marrying Ely, Montpetit went to a legislative hearing.

The author can’t be bothered to tell us what item of legislation was being discussed, but as someone who watched that hearing, I will tell you that it was LB215. I encourage anyone wanting a deeper understanding of what is happening here to read the transcript of that hearing.

The first few testifiers discussed prison inmates who are senior citizens now. After decades in prison and completing rehabilitative programming, these individuals not only acknowledge that their youthful crimes were a serious mistake, but they have made every effort to demonstrate how they have changed. One of the inmates discussed is a 60+ year old woman who knits baby booties for charity.

Contrast that against Montpetit’s testimony. She admits she is “not from Nebraska” but doesn’t disclose to the committee that she is not even a citizen of this country. She has nothing really to say for herself, but reads a statement from Ely in which he insists that he is innocent and imprisoned wrongly.

If LB215 becomes law in Nebraska, Ely won’t even qualify for consideration under this law. He hasn’t served enough time in prison and his behavior during the time he has served is marred by so much misconduct that no member of the parole board would bother to give his application more than a passing glance.

Think about it. Should convicted murders really be allowed to go on internet podcasts? No matter how badly the author of this article wants in clobber us with appeals to emotion, the facts here suggest this isn’t the sympathetic case that it’s made out to be.

I couldn’t give a crap about this bizarre lovefest.

Neither does Kristopher Winters, who was murdered while this inmate was trying to rob him. He no longer is able to love, get married, make disgusting videos, or tell us about how he was wrongly convicted.

SAY HIS NAME, JTS.

SAY HIS NAME, Elizabeth.

SAY HIS NAME, FFP.

Did you bother to read the Ely response in the comments, and others? It appears that nothing anyone can say would cause you to reexamine your harsh judgment of another human being that made a big mistake, but was not responsible for the murder of another, despite what an archaic law concluded. Unfortunately you have quite a bit of company on the right side of the political spectrum. Heartless people who likely call themselves Christians but are far from living the principles.

“your harsh judgment of another human being that made a big mistake, but was not responsible for the murder of another, despite what an archaic law concluded.”

Uh, my “judgment” of this felon is very similar to the jury that convicted him, and the many judges and justices who reviewed the conviction. It is utterly amazing that you and many others believe that you’re informed enough to alter what 12 jurors and numerous judges have concluded: this POS deserved everything he got.

The LAW considers one who engages in certain violent crimes with others legally responsible for a death that occurs while committing that violent crime. That law (“felony murder”) is nearly universal among the states, frequently applied, and morally defensible. It is in no sense “archaic”.
Nice try though excusing this felon’s outrageous behavior.

And still Ed, no mention of the name of the murdered Kristopher Winters.

Ed,

Inmates in prison don’t have access to the general internet. The tablets they are issued have very limited access that allows them to email pre-determined individuals, place phone calls to pre-determined individuals and utilize rehabilitative/educational software that has been made available to them. They are not allowed to access the wider internet or communicate with anyone who they have not been approved to communicate with. It hypothetically SHOULD be impossible for Ely to post comments to this website.

So have you stopped to ask yourself what that means? Did Ely break the rules by accessing part of the internet he isn’t allowed to access? Did Ely break the rules by asking a third party to convey a message for him? Or is that message from “Ely” not actually from him at all?

You obviously have strong views about what you believe is quality journalism–at least as it regards to FFP. ‘Just curious: what sources for news/current events (local/regional or national), in your view, do better?

So many negative comments and judgment on her sanity, her citizenship, their relationship, and his level of guilt without actually reading the article and issue at hand. The department needs to clarify rules and regulations and should not be allowed to retaliate on inmates and their loves simply because they don’t have their ducks in a row. Government bodies need to be held accountable for their actions and what they are here is overstepping and getting away with it from the looks of it. That’s the problem, not the couple in the article.

Remember Nsane- did you even read the testimony that was made by Nicholas around LB215? You obviously didn’t because he agreed with the bill and the timeline and spoke about the time it takes for a man’s brain to develop and the need to sit in prison to rehabilitate. I don’t know about his misconduct but I do know from his Facebook that he is insightful and well spoken to say the least.

J.Gross- you’re so obsessed with the crime, did you even read what happened? Nicholas didn’t have a weapon and could not even for certain be placed in the room. Ever heard of acquiesce? Poor representation is what landed him in prison, simply put.

Keyboard warriors I tell you… yawn.

So what exactly was so dangerous about him being on a podcast? Go ahead, I’ll wait. It was literally the same as a phone call. The only difference is you got to hear their love story, and maybe that’s what made the system uncomfortable. And honestly, how many of you have actually known someone or dealt with incarceration? Because if you had, you’d see this for what it is, retaliation, not safety.

It’s hard not to feel like the system reacts out of fear instead of logic. We’re not saying every inmate should have a podcast, but there needs to be clear, consistent rules.