When filmmaker Nick Beaulieu set out to make his first documentary, he wanted to understand an apparent contradiction in his hometown — “a tale of two Omahans.”
How, he wondered, could the city bill itself as one of the top middle-class cities in America while Black Omahans continued to face disproportionately bad outcomes?
“It just felt like such a disconnect,” he said. “To me, it was the biggest story in our city.”
But Beaulieu soon found himself exploring a disconnect even closer to home, one that likely feels familiar in households across the country: the growing rift between family members on opposite sides of the American political divide.
Those dual story lines — one of persistent racial inequalities and the other of family friction rooted in politics — resulted in “My Omaha,” a documentary that is gaining national attention for deftly exploring the incendiary place in which America finds itself.
The film will make its Omaha premiere Oct. 14 at Film Streams, then will continue to show at the Omaha movie theater during that month. (A list of show times is available here.)
The venue holds a special significance for Beaulieu and “My Omaha.”
While working at Film Streams as a college intern, Beaulieu saw “A Time for Burning” for the first time. The Civil Rights-era documentary about racial division in Omaha left a profound impact on Beaulieu, who grew up in a conservative west Omaha household.
“It changed everything for me politically,” said Beaulieu, who at the time was studying journalism at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. “I became obsessed with this movie …”
Beaulieu got involved with Movement in Omaha for Racial Equity (MORE) before spending the summer of 2015 traveling the U.S., which ultimately opened the door to a gig producing PBS American Portrait segments on Omaha subjects. It gave him the confidence that he could cut it in the industry.
“That experience is what rolled right into what turned out to be ‘My Omaha,’” he said. “I just didn’t know it was going to take eight years or more to make the film.”
In 2016, he set out to document the city’s growing racial justice movement, spurred by a spate of high-profile police killings of Black and brown men in the U.S. He filmed the Empowerment Network’s State of North Omaha and First United Methodist Church table talk forums. Four years later, he filmed the protests in the wake of George Floyd’s murder.
Persistent racial disparities often surfaced to the forefront of the protests. The poverty rate for Black households in Omaha is roughly 13 percentage points higher than the rate for white residents, according to a recent state-commissioned poverty elimination plan. Black Omahans also face persistently higher unemployment and a dramatically lower rate of homeownership. And, as the Flatwater Free Press reported earlier this year, Omaha has among the nation’s highest infant mortality rates for babies born to Black moms.
“What really motivated me to start the movie was trying to understand how two things could exist at the same time,” Beaulieu said of the disparities and Omaha’s image as a strong middle-class city.
“I could never understand why people were able to embrace the second part of that while completely ignoring the first.”
“A Time for Burning” featured a charismatic young Black activist who served as the film’s social conscience: Ernie Chambers. Beaulieu found a similar character who served as his guide while making a film of more modern burning times: Omaha activist Leo Louis II, the former Malcolm X Memorial Foundation board chair.
Louis was skeptical when Beaulieu first asked if he could follow him with his camera.
“A lot of people come and exploit the community by filming whatever tragedy or struggle people are going through, and then they disappear,” Louis said. “They go off and talk about their story without involving the people in the community. Nick said his intention is to bring the city together through this work.”
Beaulieu soon found that effort extending to his personal life as he set out to resolve a widening rift between himself and his conservative father, Randy Beaulieu. The elder Beaulieu agreed to sit for a series of conversations with his son.
The intimate, sometimes painful interactions — interposed with sweet home movies Randy shot of Nick while growing up — show that even in the presence of love, it can be hard finding common ground.
Those efforts took on urgency after Randy Beaulieu received a terminal cancer diagnosis. He died Sept. 2, 2020, at the age of 59.
“I felt like my dad was tremendously vulnerable to open himself up the way he did and to be totally transparent about his beliefs,” Beaulieu said. “I felt the pressure as the storyteller to make it fair and accurate and compelling.”
Beaulieu appears to have accomplished that mission based on one of the more meta moments in the film. We see Beaulieu talking with “A Time for Burning” director Bill Jersey, who tells the younger filmmaker that he shouldn’t expect to move his father from fundamentalist beliefs. Jersey then watches footage of the two Beaulieus embracing, even as their differences remain.
“When you’re seeing me and Bill Jersey sitting in his living room watching clips of interviews I did with my father and Bill says, ‘You’ve done it, that’s all I need to know, that’s what I was waiting for,’ he basically gives me closure,” Beaulieu said. “He actually helps me see who I am in relation to my story, which is really a beautiful and poetic thing that happens.”
Jersey also helped Beaulieu come to a hard realization: Often, there’s no grand truth or revelation to attain through this kind of work.
“When you start to get invested in caring about these issues, you realize after some time how long it takes for things to change,” Beaulieu said. “It was important for me to understand it’s really not about trying to find the absolute truth and then rest on that but that the real power comes from always looking for it, continuing to seek it, to stay open-minded, to challenge yourself.”
Jersey and his film’s influence on “My Omaha” runs throughout the film. Much of “A Time for Burning” focuses on Augustana Lutheran Church and its struggle to accept interracial fellowship, which forces a break among the church’s parishioners. Beaulieu zeroed in on First United Methodist Church, which was hosting dialogues over America’s unfinished business of racism.
“I felt like here’s another church 50 years later having the same conversations. … I wanted to see the then and now of these two stories. I felt at that time that (the) church was having some of the most dynamic conversations involving white people when it came to racial justice.”
Despite his initial skepticism, Louis said he is proud to be part of the film. Omaha, partially due to its location in the heart of the country and its cultural middle ground, is very much a pivot point for America’s ongoing efforts to grapple with race, he said.
“The most important thing this film offers is letting people know they’re not alone in questioning their identity or the identity of this country, that we all can begin the process of soul-searching,” Louis said. “That can bring us together as a country.”
But, he added, some audiences will undoubtedly be averse to the change the film aims to bring about.
The film’s power comes from its transparency, said former First United Methodist pastor Cynthia Lindenmeyer, who served as another guide for Beaulieu in the film. Rather than focus on “who is right,” the film reveals how important it is to dialogue and invest in relationships.
“The film emphasizes that disagreement must not translate into avoidance, but the opposite, fully engaging in conversation,” Lindenmeyer said.
Beaulieu is quick to note the help he received with his directorial debut. That includes funding — local, state and national grants helped finance the film.
The most rewarding response has come from people who said the film motivated them to reach out to a friend or family member from whom they have become estranged.
“It means a lot to know the film has moved people to take that kind of action,” Beaulieu said.
21 Comments
Well researched, in-depth, article. The statement “trying to understand how two things could exist at the same time” is poignant.
Your name is Free Press, why are you so biased towards the conservative voice of the nation?
“why are you so biased towards the conservative voice of the nation?”
Because most of these online “new journalism” outlets depend on grants and donations, and the vast majority of that funding comes from the left/liberals. Alienate that constituency, and the funding dries up.
Now, FFP tries to do a balanced job, but it does not employ “journalists” who come from diverse religious, ideological, racial, and ethnic backgrounds, and thus its vision is narrowed.
I for one enjoy reading FFP stories, especially the local “human interest-type” of stories, but one must arrive at the FFP site with a jaundiced eye knowing the bias that accompanies most stories. The most glaring examples are the immigration-porn type of sob stories on FFP that focus exclusively on the heartstrings, and not the cold facts of all that goes wrong when illegal immigration is allowed to flourish, as it did under Uncle Joe Biden.
Even the headline for this story is insightful: “discussion on America’s division”. Promoting “division” sells and feeds further division. A story on America’s promise and successes does not.
Mr. Betts, who would you highlight as “the conservative voice of the nation”?
Excellent Read
Thank you
This isn’t to be rude, but conservatism depends on a kind of willful ignorance of history and perspective. It’s Plato’s cave in real time—everything makes sense only as long as the shadows are all you see. Conservatism thrives on keeping knowledge narrow and celebrating that narrowness. It’s a cultural blind spot, and outside of it, the rest of the world sees more clearly.
😂 sounds like excuse making by the left, which is typical… no accountability no responsibility only excuses!
That is not correct.
Not to be rude, any time I hear one side trying to explain the other, the biggest gap is between the partisan’s narrative and reality. As a conservative I find your narrative to be insulting and ignorant of reality.
“Conservatism thrives on keeping knowledge narrow ”
Liberalism/leftism/marxism thrives on killing voices that they don’t like, in order to keep their “knowledge” from the masses. Not to be rude, but Liberalism/leftism/marxism is all about keeping the masses in darkness by force.
I knew Randy from an animal rescue where we both volunteered. He worked until he had exhausted himself every time. The physical strength gave out before his mental strength. Always upbeat. I’m glad he could participate in this project with his son.
Where can I view this film?
Film Streams
https://filmstreams.org/
The problem in Omaha is part of the Black community was taken over by drugs and partying and blaming white people. Yet, the majority of Black Omaha residents don’t live in North Omaha anymore. This film would probably been better off in showing how there are two to three very different Black communities with different expectations and outcomes. Unfortunately, most white people, particularly progressives, only see black and white.
I am so glad to read this article Leo. I am 70 and have always been at odds with my family as we are so divided. My mom and I were very much on the same page. My brothers are very much in 180 opposition. We agree to disagree, but that means we only discuss family, we never discuss these off-limits topics. My dad passed before I could really have a feel for where his beliefs were grounded. I look forward to seeing this film.
Bud Crawford. Nuff said.
Beautiful story Leo. Can’t wait to see the film.
As we see here, accepting there are other valid worldviews is tough for some to grasp. Human nature makes the more educated condensing to others. Especially when your worldview is rejected by the voters of the country you live in. The “elite” take and influence on the left is what caused their defeat. I’ve yet to see many of these educated grasp why they are rejected by the masses. Who’s going to converse with arrogant people? Just those in the bubble of arrogance. Yes I have a 4 year degree. But then, it has no influence in my life. As they said when I earned, doesn’t matter what in, just that you got it.
It is systemically racist to say that because of someone’s race they are not capable of equity. As someone who actually grew up in North Omaha you need to stop the rhetoric that color makes anyone less capable of success. It’s critical race theory – and it’s WRONG.
“A Time for Burning” featured a charismatic young Black activist who served as the film’s social conscience: Ernie Chambers”
Sorry, but any “documentary” that claims such a racist bigot as Ernie Chambers is anyone’s conscience is deeply flawed.
A just God would find a special place in he!! for the likes of haters like Chambers.
Not in my name.
No H8 in my state.
Pope Paul VI published a declaration entitled, Nostrae Aetate, which acknowledged non Christian religions, Muslim, Jewish, Budist, and Hindu all have a pièce of the truth. I bélière we can and should learn from all cultures and religions to become better persons ourselves. No culture or religion has all the truth or all the answers as to how we can be better people.