Dan Griffith is just scraping by.
His work restoring windmills and the income from his farmland has kept the lights on, he said, but not much more.
That could change – if Griffith’s plans survive one of the latest controversies to grip rural Nebraska.
Griffith’s 160 acres in Lancaster County, typically planted with corn and soybeans, are prime real estate for Nebraska’s newest “cash crop”: solar power.
“I’ve been working dead-end jobs since I got out of college,” said Griffith, 40. “With the solar farm, once it gets going, I could see maybe in excess of six figures a year — steadily.”
Long after wind power arrived in the state, large-scale solar energy is reaching Nebraska, with the first major project going on line next year. The 81-megawatt project will supply power to the Omaha Public Power District through solar panels situated across 500 acres. Six other large-scale projects are in the works, including the one Griffith is banking on in Lancaster County.
But where Griffith and others see opportunity, even necessity, some rural residents see betrayal. And it has sparked a backlash across the state, resulting in a lawsuit in Lancaster County, the recall of an elected official in Saunders County and solar zoning regulations in Kearney and Gage counties that are among some of the most restrictive in the nation.
The resistance factored into an OPPD proposal to back off its explicit commitment to add significant amounts of solar power. Instead the utility proposes to commit to “non-emitting” fuel, a change that it says will also give it more flexibility in responding to market conditions.
With solar, as with wind, Nebraska is at a crossroads: How — and whether — to integrate large-scale solar energy into the fabric of rural life? The issue is dividing communities in Nebraska and nationally as it raises larger questions about land rights, economic growth and the health of the planet.
Solar is not new in Nebraska. There are numerous small projects across the state and about 20 that generate at least 1 megawatt, according to the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy. That includes Norfolk’s 8.5 megawatt site, currently Nebraska’s largest.
But the seven projects in the pipeline are exponentially larger than existing ones. If all materialize, they would generate about 1,900 megawatts of solar power, enough to equal about 18% of Nebraska’s electric generation capacity as of 2021, based on state and federal data.
Whether they all materialize in light of the coalescing opposition remains to be seen.
The soon-to-be-completed Saunders County project and a much larger one getting underway in Cass County withstood challenges by some residents.
In Lancaster County, landowners opposing the $320 million, 1,800-acre Salt Creek Solar project have filed a lawsuit seeking to stop it. They argue that they purchased their acreages based on documents indicating that the adjoining land would remain agricultural.
“The lawsuit brought by the homeowners is not in opposition to solar power or the planned solar facility as a whole,” said their attorney, Damien J. Wright. “Rather, the lawsuit relates to whether solar-related equipment can be installed on outlots located within the subdivisions that were specifically reserved for agricultural and rural use.”
Attorneys representing the solar developer and four landowners contend that solar is indeed an agricultural use: “Salt Creek’s project will harvest a natural resource, the sun,” the attorneys wrote in court documents.
A judge is currently considering the case.
In Saunders County, Teresa Akeson and some of her neighbors tried to stop the project being developed for OPPD.
“The desire by big-money business to do and get what they want overruns local governments – all the way down to the little guy just trying to do the best they can for their families,” said Akeson. Like many of those on both sides of the issue, Akeson’s family has farmed in Nebraska for generations.
OPPD is experiencing unprecedented growth, and its leaders say it must double its output in the next decade. Renewable energy is among the most cost-effective solutions, according to OPPD.
When opponents failed to stop the project, they turned their attention to longtime Saunders County Board Member Doris Karloff, whose family owns property where the solar farm is being built. Karloff recused herself from the board discussion and the vote, which was unanimous. Still, her neighbors vented their anger by recalling her from office in 2021. Karloff could not be reached for comment.
Opposition in a few counties has been so intense, officials have enacted extensive buffer zones between solar panels and the homes of nonparticipating landowners.
Kearney County has required a quarter-mile buffer for several years. At the end of May, Gage County adopted regulations that include a half-mile buffer.
Emily Haxby, a Gage County board member who has worked for stricter regulation of renewables, said solar developers can “shrink” the setbacks by securing waivers from neighboring landowners, including, possibly by paying those landowners.
“I’m a fifth-generation farmer and I want to protect what I’m going to be passing along to my, hopefully, next generation,” she said. “I want to make regulations based on community decisions.”
The Gage and Kearney County setbacks are among the strictest solar buffer zones in the nation, said Matthew Eisenson, an attorney who leads the Renewable Energy Legal Defense Initiative at New York’s Columbia University.
Outside of those two counties, Eisenson said Nebraska “appears to have relatively few serious restrictions on solar energy.”
One of the primary criticisms of solar power is the amount of land it requires and whether renewable energy is a proper use of that land.
“(Solar) doesn’t produce electricity 24 hours a day, and they are trying to put it on the best dryland ag land in the state,” said Duane Murdoch, who is in his third term on the Cass County Board. “If you put it on poor land, I’m all for it.”
Utilities say solar is valuable because it generates power during the day when electrical demand is highest and it does so at a lower cost than building a coal or nuclear plant.
Some opponents go a step further than Murdoch and say large-scale solar doesn’t belong in rural areas.
“When you move out to the country, ag is there, it’s not a new industry,” said Haxby. “You’re making an informed decision that farming will occur in the place you are choosing to live. When you bring in a new industry, that’s not something you choose to live next to.”
Griffith, one of the land owners hoping to lease his property for the Lancaster County project and whose land is not a target of that lawsuit, said neighboring acreages shouldn’t be able to dictate how he uses his land.
“(Neighbors) are fighting it tooth and nail because they think they have more say over it because of their 5 acres, quite honestly,” he said.
Murdoch was among those who lobbied for stricter setbacks when Cass County wrote zoning rules that would govern a solar project NextEra Energy Resources is developing near Murray.
NextEra has leased 3,000 acres. About 40%-50% of that will be for setbacks from roads and adjoining properties, riparian areas, drainage and trees, said Matthew Jones, project developer.
NextEra plans to invest about $476 million in the site, which would generate about 320 megawatts of electricity, enough to power as many as 66,000 households. The Florida-based company has, or is developing, wind projects in eight Nebraska counties.
NextEra chose the site for the solar farm, in part, because of its proximity to the grid. It would use less than 1% of farmland in Cass County.
The Engelkemier family, who trace their Nebraska farm roots to 1875, wrestled for a year with whether to lease some of their land to NextEra.
“We spent about 11 months with an attorney,” said Larry Engelkemier. “It was a decision that was not made quickly.
They ultimately decided: Yes.
“One of the reasons I wanted to go into solar was to diversify our agricultural income source and allow the land to naturally rejuvenate during the solar lease,” he said. “We want to keep the farms in the Engelkemier name for future generations.”
The family sees solar as ag-based energy production, similar to ethanol and biofuels.
“If you take a look at the current agricultural situation, a lot of it is green energy,” Engelkemier said, pointing to corn and soybeans.
Currently, solar makes up less than 1% of the state’s electricity, while coal constitutes almost 50% and wind about 25%. The rest is largely nuclear and hydropower, according to the state energy department.
For now, solar and wind are some of the best options for feeding the nation’s growing appetite for electricity, according to utility executives. New nuclear technology is at least a decade away. Coal plants emit harmful – and economically unsustainable – amounts of greenhouse gasses and other pollutants. Natural gas prices are volatile.
Global greenhouse gas emissions must fall by 43% by 2030 to avoid more devastating changes than ones already occurring in climate and life systems, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Nebraska’s own climate scientists say it’s possible the state will warm so rapidly that by 2050 Nebraska’s average temperature will be similar to 2012, its hottest year on record. That year extreme drought crippled agricultural output, wildfires consumed a record number of acres and numerous communities restricted water.
Across the board, Nebraska’s major utilities have pledged to reach net zero carbon emissions in the decades ahead. In addition to solar and wind, the state’s utilities are championing research that they hope will eventually lead to affordable nuclear energy.
Difficulties bringing solar sites to life worries the head of OPPD.
By now, OPPD had hoped to have 600 megawatts of solar on line, according to President and CEO Javier Fernandez. Instead it is adding just 81 megawatts next year.
Local opposition hasn’t been the only hurdle for solar. Other obstacles have included supply chain problems, tariffs and regulatory slowdowns.
“If we want this state to continue to be prosperous and growing … we (need) to dispel the myth that, ‘Hey, this (wind or solar project) is a nice project to have,’” Fernandez told the board in May. “A lot of these projects, we needed them yesterday, and we haven’t even broken ground. It’s going to be a challenge.”
The Flatwater Free Press is Nebraska’s first independent, nonprofit newsroom focused on investigations and feature stories that matter.
8 Comments
Thank you Nancy for your thorough reporting. I believe solar to be essential in our fight against climate change. Climate change is affecting Ag and so it seems that it is important that we consider all energy options . Trees may be able to be planted between solar field and property.
For a weather reporter to ignore the tornado reality within Nebraska is so dramatically wrong. Are you still retired from reality?
Great report. Thank you!
Thanks for your excellent coverage of this topic, Nancy, and FFP! Ongoing education and transparency about renewable energy (locally and elsewhere) remain critically important to all of us.
I love solar power, but unfortunately the methods used include voltage inverters which emit huge quantities of RF interference which makes listening to AM radio and HF shortwave amateur radio communications difficult or impossible anywhere near a house sized array, let alone acres of it. Don’t pollute the radio spectrum!
I am not sure which way you are leaning with your story. Holt is set to put in a 1/2 mile restriction. There is no reason other than the same as the Gage county guy. Why should or would people want to put up with being able to use their ground as they see fit, when it is not harming anyone else.
These restrictions are crazy. In the same breath most of these people are complaining about their property tax bills. Yet they want to chase out any development.
Part of the problem is who washes the panels cleans the snow off and pays the repairs after 5 to 7 years their contract is very vague for the land owner
This is a dead argument. One word AGRIVOLTAICS.
Same land producing solar energy and crops and the panels improve both yield and quality of the crop harvest by protecting the crops from weather extremes.